vMix in the cloud

Why vMix? A Deep Dive into Software-Based Production for Modern Workflows

As someone who’s explored software-based solutions for video production since the late 1990s, I’m a big fan of vMix and have put it to the test in a variety of production environments. Here’s a breakdown of why vMix is a compelling tool, how it compares to alternatives like TriCaster, and what you should consider when integrating it into your workflow.

A Bit of History

My first brush with software-driven production was with the Video Toaster, which won an Emmy for Technical Achievement in 1993. Back then, the idea of software handling production tasks was revolutionary but limited. Around the same time, I was also using AVID for editing; my initial AVID experience was at a post house called Matchframe, working alongside Terry Curran. The learning curve was steep, and tech support was essential—we often started sessions on hold with support as AVID tended to lock up during long sessions. This experience made me cautious about software for live production, where stability is crucial.

From Video Toaster to TriCaster: The Transition to Software-Based Production

We eventually bought a Video Toaster but found it too unreliable, and it became a high-tech doorstop. Over time, however, the Video Toaster evolved into the TriCaster, now part of Vzrt, which has become a viable and reliable broadcast solution. TriCaster’s origins in the broadcast environment mean its interface replicates traditional physical switchers, offering a familiar setup for operators with broadcast experience.

Enter vMix: A Different Philosophy

Unlike TriCaster, vMix takes a distinctly software-centric approach. It’s designed more like a computer application than a traditional broadcast system, which requires a shift in mindset. When you look at vMix, you’re not just seeing a software switcher; you’re looking at a versatile tool that combines switching, graphics, video playback, audio routing, recording, streaming, and even automated triggers.

While it can be a bit complex to learn initially, its flexibility makes it a powerful choice for diverse production needs.

My Experience with vMix: Applications and Reliability

In the last few years, I’ve used vMix for:

• Live production

• Master control operations

• Remote monitoring setups

• Live sports and single-camera studio shoots

• Integrating with NDI tools for routing, bridging, and input/output management

I’ve run vMix both on-premise and remotely, and even in the cloud for complex productions. With a robust computer and network, it has proven incredibly stable, even during long hours of production. (Pro tip: I still reboot the system before each production as a safeguard.)

Real-World Example: Running a Tight, High-Impact Production on vMix

One recent project involved streaming 20-30 minute, two- to three-person interviews hourly over six-hour days for a new OTT channel. Our task was essentially to replicate the functions of a production truck, including:

• Switching cameras, recording line cuts (clean and dirty), and ISO recordings for each camera

• Adding live graphics, feeding onset monitors

• Streaming primary and backup RTMP feeds to a CDN

The team was just myself and a producer, with a tight budget. We set up with a vMix-capable PC, three NDI PTZ cameras, three wireless mics, a Focusrite audio interface, a seven-light kit, high-speed Ethernet, and a 1Gbps up/down internet connection—all within a four-foot by twelve-foot production space. Using vMix, we streamlined processes and automated actions like launching opening titles and dissolving into the host with a single keystroke.

Conclusion: Is vMix Right for Your Workflow?

For anyone exploring software-based production, vMix offers flexibility, efficiency, and a broad range of applications, often outperforming traditional systems when space and budget are constrained. If you’re ready to step beyond broadcast norms and are looking for a capable, cost-effective solution, vMix is worth a serious look.